6 results for 'cat:"Employment Discrimination" AND cat:"Whistleblowers" AND cat:"Employment Retaliation"'.
J. Jenkins partially grants an Illinois' city's motion for summary judgment on employment discrimination and retaliation claims brought by one of its former employees. That former employee objected to the city converting her finance director position from part-time hourly to full-time salaried, its decision to fire her when she refused to work the longer hours for less money, and its move to outsource its finance department to a private firm. The court dismisses her claims brought under the Equal Protection Clause, the Illinois Human Rights Act and the First Amendment, but allows her gender discrimination, Illinois Whistleblower Act and retaliatory termination claims to proceed.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Jenkins, Filed On: June 29, 2023, Case #: 1:18cv2475, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, whistleblowers, employment Retaliation
J. Schroeder denies, in part, a university's motion to dismiss an individual's claims related to the school's decision not to hire her as a fencing coach. She has sufficiently pleaded allegations to support her claim for discrimination and retaliation based on the school's attempt to blackball her due, in part, to the fact she is a sexual assault victim and whistleblower.
Court: USDC Middle District of North Carolina, Judge: Schroeder, Filed On: June 13, 2023, Case #: 1:22cv513, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, whistleblowers, employment Retaliation
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. McShane denies summary judgment to the department of corrections for the corrections officer's claim that another officer sexually assaulted her, leading her to resign when rumors circulated that she consensually slept with the other officer to advance her career. A jury could reasonably assume that the corrections officer's co-workers retaliated against her for filing her complaint because the rumors and hostile work environment happened on a regular basis for nearly a year, to the point that she had to take leave multiple times to handle her anxiety and panic attacks, and the department of corrections' refusal to investigate the rumors could be construed as retaliation.
Court: USDC Oregon, Judge: McShane, Filed On: May 23, 2023, Case #: 6:21cv1267, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, whistleblowers, employment Retaliation